Skip to main content

How to choose single chip microcomputer or PLC in the field of industrial control

 Choosing between a single chip microcomputer and a PLC for industrial control applications depends on a number of factors, including the complexity of the control system, the required level of reliability and robustness, the cost constraints, and the required speed and accuracy of control.

Here are some general guidelines to consider:


  1. Control system complexity: If the control system is relatively simple, with a limited number of inputs and outputs and basic logic requirements, a single chip microcomputer may be sufficient. However, if the control system is complex, with a large number of inputs and outputs, complex logic requirements, and the need for real-time operation, a PLC may be a better choice.
  2. Reliability and robustness: PLCs are designed for industrial control applications and are built to withstand harsh environments, including temperature extremes, humidity, and electrical noise. Single chip microcomputers may not be as robust and may not be able to withstand the same level of environmental stress.
  3. Cost: Single chip microcomputers are generally less expensive than PLCs, particularly for low-end applications. However, as the complexity and robustness requirements increase, the cost of the microcomputer may approach or exceed that of a PLC.
  4. Speed and accuracy: If fast and accurate control is required, a PLC may be a better choice, as they are designed for real-time operation and have specialized hardware and software to ensure fast and accurate control. Single chip microcomputers may be slower and may not be optimized for real-time operation.
  5. Scalability: If the control system is expected to expand or change in the future, a PLC may be a better choice as they are designed to be scalable and can easily be expanded by adding additional modules or processors. Single chip microcomputers may require significant redesigns or additional hardware to accommodate expansion.
  6. Development time: Single chip microcomputers may require more development time and effort to implement, as they require software development and may need custom hardware design. PLCs, on the other hand, often have pre-built software libraries and can be quickly programmed using standard industrial control programming languages.
  7. Support and maintenance: PLCs often have established support channels and maintenance plans, which can be beneficial for industrial control applications where downtime can be costly. Single chip microcomputers may not have the same level of support and maintenance options.
  8. Industry standards: If the control system needs to meet specific industry standards, such as safety or regulatory compliance, a PLC may be a better choice as they are often designed to meet these standards. Single chip microcomputers may require additional hardware or software modifications to meet these standards.

Ultimately, the choice between a single chip microcomputer and a PLC will depend on the specific needs of the industrial control application, including the required level of complexity, reliability, speed, scalability, and support.


Comments

  1. Readers seeking depth and credibility will appreciate how VinoTurf delivers expert insights across multiple categories. The articles are engaging, informative, and designed to provide real value to a diverse audience.

    ReplyDelete
  2. While navigating global news platforms, Sfyrigmata stands out for its thoughtful approach to reporting. The content is informative, well-written, and designed to help readers understand complex international topics.

    ReplyDelete
  3. While navigating modern news platforms, TurfMillan stands out for its structured and informative articles. The content offers valuable perspectives on business and technology without overwhelming readers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ferrules and Cross Ferruling

 Ferrules are identification labels provided for every wire terminations in an instrument, equipment, or electrical/instrumentation control panels. These tube-shaped sleeves can be inserted easily on each individual wire in a multi-core cable. In earlier days fixed digits/letters are used as ferrules, but now Instrumentation engineers/technicians prints out desired ferrules by using a ferrule printing machine. Typical Ferrule The numbers/ letters on the ferrules will be given as per the approved electrical hook up or loop diagrams. This helps technicians to easily identify a particular loop/wiring from a series of terminal blocks and to troubleshoot the desired terminal connection. Separate numbers on the ferrules distinguish the positive and negative polarities of wires, thus ensure the polarity protection of the instrument. Cross Ferruling  As a wire is connected on its both ends, it is quite useful to use a cross reference method for wire identification. Unlike normal ferru...

What is a Torbar? – Averaging Pitot Tubes

 The Torbar is employed for flow measurement of liquids, gases, or steam in circular, square, or rectangular section ducts for large flow rates. The Torbar is an insertion type multi-port self-averaging primary sensor for flow measurement. Torbar TORBAR is a set of Pitot tubes mounted on a bar across the pipeline with no moving parts. An averaging Pitot tube is a technology, while TORBAR is a manufacturing brand name. There are several brands available in the market with VERABAR, ANNUBAR, etc. Averaging Pitot Tube Principle Purpose Averaging Pitot tube can be employed when the average velocity of the flow profile, rather than the velocity in a specific point in the cross-section is desired. Averaging Pitot Tubes Principle It measures the differential pressure between the static pressure tap and the tap of full pressure of a stream. Thus such magnitude of differential pressure is directly proportional to the square of the flow rate. Working The TORBAR is designed in such a way that ...

The Method and Process of Siemens PLC Hardware Configuration

 The hardware configuration of Siemens PLC can usually adopt the following methods and processes: Determine control tasks and system requirements: Before hardware configuration, it is necessary to clarify the tasks and requirements of the control system, including the requirements for input and output points, control accuracy, speed, and safety. Select the PLC model and module: According to the control task and requirements, select the appropriate PLC model and module, including CPU, I/O module, communication module, power supply module, etc. Assemble the cabinet and install the modules: According to the selected PLC model and module, assemble the cabinet and install the modules, pay attention to the installation sequence, cable wiring, wiring method, etc. Connect the input and output devices: connect the input and output devices with the input and output modules of the PLC, you need to pay attention to the correctness, stability and safety of the wiring. Perform software configura...