Skip to main content

Hybrid Level Measurement Principle, Selection, Installation, Limitations and Calibration

 The level measurement is based on a hybrid technology: which consists of capacitance and GWR. The system is based on the GWR technology, whereas for interface applications this method is combined with a capacitive measurement.

The two technologies were chosen because of the performance of capacitance technology with emulsion layers and the GWR’s performance for precise overall level. The reference point R of the measurement is located at the process connection.

Hybrid Level Measurement

Figure – Hybrid capacitance/GWR measurement principle

Where,

R = reference point of measurement
E = empty calibration (= zero)
F = full calibration 1= span)
LN = probe length
UP thickness upper medium
DL = distace level complete
LL = level complete
D1 = distance interface (distance flange / DC2)
L1 = level interface (distance probe end / DC1)

The Measuring Range (example)

  • Rod Probe ≤4 m/13 ft
  • Rope Probe ≤10 m/33 ft
  • Coaxial probe ≤6 m/20 ft
Interface with emulsion layer
If a clear interface layer exists, the hybrid system measures the overall level and the interface via the guided radar mode. In the background, the capacitive analysis always operates simultaneously and calculates the capacity value using the measured distances and the known capacitive conditions of the coaxial probe and derives the DC value of the oil layer from it.

This measured DC value is used, in turn, for the time‐of‐flight correction in the interface measurement through the oil layer which makes it possible to measure interfaces. Even in large DC value fluctuations of the upper hydrocarbon layer.

In traditional guided radar probes, the emulsion layer causes a loss of signal of the interface surface but keep the upper layer level (e.g. oil). The hybrid capacitance/GWR automatically switches to the capacitive mode and provide the lower level (water).

In presence of emulsion, the hybrid capacitance/GWR measures the upper layer level and the lower conductive layer below the emulsion. The overall emulsion layer cannot be known.

Limitations
  • GWR and capacitance limitations also apply to the hybrid capacitance/GWR technology. In presence of emulsion, only the capacitance technology measures the presence of water.
  • The DC of the upper medium should be known and constant.
  • The DC of the upper medium may not be greater than 10.
  • The DC difference between the upper medium and lower medium should be >10.
  • The distance between the upper layer and the interface should minimum be 60 mm.
  • Conductivity of the upper medium: <1 µS/cm
  • Conductivity of the lower medium: >100 µS/cm
  • Cannot measure a media which lead to fouling or heavy build up on the probe.
  • Selection
  • For interface measurement, ideally coax probes or rod probes in a chamber/cage/stilling well are used.

Coax probes are suited to liquids with viscosities of up to approximately 500cst. Coax probes can measure most liquefied gases, as of a dielectric constant of 1.4. Installation conditions, such as nozzles, vessel internal fittings etc. have no effect on the measurement when a coax probe is used. A coax probe offers maximum EMC safety when used in plastic vessels.

Rope probes may be used in a chamber/stilling well, if there is sufficient head room to install a rod probe. This can exclude the rope or end‐of‐probe weight touches the wall of the tube (diameter large enough, precisely vertical tube).

Design

The hybrid capacitance/GWR should have the right probe for the appropriate level range for the application.

Installation

Rod/rope probes can be mounted in a stilling well or chamber/cage. In this case, the distance of the rod/rope probe and internal diameter of the chamber/cage/stilling well should be between 40 mm and 100 mm. The distance from the end of rod/rode probe to the bottom of the vessel should minimum be 10 mm.

Coax probe can also be used and be mounted at an arbitrary distance from the wall of the vessel.

Within the measuring range, the rod/rope/coax probe should not get into contact with the chamber /cage/stilling well wall. If required, centre disks should be used. Centre disks should not be located in the measuring range.

For long rope/coax probe an additional weight or a spring should be considered.

For underground vessels rod/rope/coax probe should be designed with large nozzle diameters in order to avoid reflections at the nozzle wall.

For non‐metallic vessels coax probe is recommended.

For vessels with heat insulation, the electronic housing should be located outside the vessel insulation. This is to prevent the electronics from heating up as a result of heat radiation or convection.

The insulation should not exceed the points labeled ‘max’ in the figure below.

Figure – Hybrid capacitance or GWR level transmitter installation with heat insulation

Calibration and configuration for interface level measurement
Calibration is performed in the factory with complete assembly. In situ calibrations (low and high range) are only used for recording the linearity protocol. In case the calibration values are different from the factory ones they should be set as a customized parameterization.

The actual upper media DC value should be known.

Wet calibration: The probe can be calibrated for its full range, i.e. lower interface level (0% level calibration) and high interface level (100% level). Other intermediate values can also be performed. Low interface level simulation aims to suppress the false echo (for GWR measurement) and provide 0% level value for the capacitance part. High interface level simulation aims to provide the maximum range value for both GWR measurement and capacitance part.
Dry calibration: The level capacitance can be simulated by entering the low and high level values. Capacitance units will calculate automatically the capacitance variation image based in the factory calibration for ≥100 μS/cm.

Source : International Association of Oil & Gas Producers

Acknowledgements : IOGP Instrumentation and Automaton Standards Subcommittee (IASSC), BG Group, BP, Endress + Hauser, Emerson, Honeywell, Krohne, Petrobras, PETRONAS Carigali Sdn Bhd, Repsol, Siemens, Statoil, Total, Vega, Yokogawa.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is a Torbar? – Averaging Pitot Tubes

 The Torbar is employed for flow measurement of liquids, gases, or steam in circular, square, or rectangular section ducts for large flow rates. The Torbar is an insertion type multi-port self-averaging primary sensor for flow measurement. Torbar TORBAR is a set of Pitot tubes mounted on a bar across the pipeline with no moving parts. An averaging Pitot tube is a technology, while TORBAR is a manufacturing brand name. There are several brands available in the market with VERABAR, ANNUBAR, etc. Averaging Pitot Tube Principle Purpose Averaging Pitot tube can be employed when the average velocity of the flow profile, rather than the velocity in a specific point in the cross-section is desired. Averaging Pitot Tubes Principle It measures the differential pressure between the static pressure tap and the tap of full pressure of a stream. Thus such magnitude of differential pressure is directly proportional to the square of the flow rate. Working The TORBAR is designed in such a way that ...

Ferrules and Cross Ferruling

 Ferrules are identification labels provided for every wire terminations in an instrument, equipment, or electrical/instrumentation control panels. These tube-shaped sleeves can be inserted easily on each individual wire in a multi-core cable. In earlier days fixed digits/letters are used as ferrules, but now Instrumentation engineers/technicians prints out desired ferrules by using a ferrule printing machine. Typical Ferrule The numbers/ letters on the ferrules will be given as per the approved electrical hook up or loop diagrams. This helps technicians to easily identify a particular loop/wiring from a series of terminal blocks and to troubleshoot the desired terminal connection. Separate numbers on the ferrules distinguish the positive and negative polarities of wires, thus ensure the polarity protection of the instrument. Cross Ferruling  As a wire is connected on its both ends, it is quite useful to use a cross reference method for wire identification. Unlike normal ferru...

The Method and Process of Siemens PLC Hardware Configuration

 The hardware configuration of Siemens PLC can usually adopt the following methods and processes: Determine control tasks and system requirements: Before hardware configuration, it is necessary to clarify the tasks and requirements of the control system, including the requirements for input and output points, control accuracy, speed, and safety. Select the PLC model and module: According to the control task and requirements, select the appropriate PLC model and module, including CPU, I/O module, communication module, power supply module, etc. Assemble the cabinet and install the modules: According to the selected PLC model and module, assemble the cabinet and install the modules, pay attention to the installation sequence, cable wiring, wiring method, etc. Connect the input and output devices: connect the input and output devices with the input and output modules of the PLC, you need to pay attention to the correctness, stability and safety of the wiring. Perform software configura...